People often write me to ask if I know a good book on how to heal X.
The answer is yes. I do. Here is my reply to the most recent request.
Good morning, dear,
People often write me to ask if I know a good book on how to heal X.
The answer is yes. I do. Here is my reply to the most recent request.
Good morning, dear,
Yeah, every man’s fantasy, I’m sure.
But this story will wig that sort of guy completely out.
Here is what happened:
My friend, Joy and I were at Ten Thousand Waves in Santa Fe. We and a few other women over 40 were comfortably lounging naked in the hot mineral water when in come 8 bikini-clad 20-somethings. Turns out they were a bride & bridesmaids getting ready for a wedding.
We all chatted a while. They were very sweet. Then one of their group asked the others if anyone would mind her taking a picture to remember the afternoon by. Several declined, and she said, “oh, right. I guess I shouldn’t take your pic in the bathing suits and all. Okay. I’m sorry.”
Now, these are 20-somethings, and all but one had model-perfect figures.
So, I couldn’t help it, especially since I had been noticing how beautiful I found these women – all of us. I turned to the 40-somethings, (actually, at least 2 were over 60) and asked if any of them would mind if I took a photo of the group of us there in the hot spring?
Nah, that’s fine… every single dang one of us… 7 mostly overweight, post-baby, far from our youth and still beautiful women could have cared less if a total stranger took a digital photo of us all naked in the pool.
Go figure.
I prefer to think that we were far more comfortable in our bodies than these lovely ladies half our age, and I think that was just it. We were *comfortable* with ourselves.
Love, Ann
“The truth will set you free. But first, it will piss you off.”
- Gloria Steinem
I’ve been getting more and more truthful for some years now. I find that lack of truth is the strongest and most prevalent stressor in my life, maybe the only one, I’m not sure.
“If you tell the truth you don’t have to remember anything.”
- Mark Twain
Marvin, my ex-husband, had a rule. He said keeping track of what he could say and what he could not say was just too hard. Therefore, he advised people not to tell him anything he could not repeat. I respected that about him. We both had a similar experience of and desire for honesty and truth. I think it’s the strongest part of our bond, and it remains until this day.
I’ve been working on bringing some congruence to some of my relationships and choices.
I found that I was working too hard in some friendships that weren’t giving anything back. But in the process, my penchant for truth-telling came up – the how and when of it, not to mention the whether. I literally wrote a couple of girlfriends and asked “are we friends?” I couldn’t figure it out. They didn’t call, didn’t invite me over, never saw me unless Iooked for them. There were reasons for this, too. I once spoke a truth about one of them that she considers to have caused her much stress. And given that to do over, I would not.
Forgiveness recognizes what you thought your brother did to you has not occurred. It does not pardon sins and make them real. It sees there was no sin. And in that view are all your sins forgiven. What is sin, except a false idea about Truth?
- Helen Schucman
She doesn’t really know how to forgive, but she keeps calling me lately, not even sure why she is doing so, even asking me whether there is any reason she may be calling.
Finally, I used Marvin’s rule. I told her, “Look, if you’re worried about what I may say to others, don’t tell me.” I put the ball back in her court. It’s not up to me to police my words for her comfort or sense of safety and security.
Now I can rest about it.
What she does with that is up to her. I am out of her business. I am not constantly trying to figure out what she does and does not want me to say. And I should mention that she *has* told me some things that she asked me not to repeat, and I have not, ever, not to anyone, not even her closest friend who I am pretty sure knows more than I do about her preferences.
Truth is really important to me – I’m pretty sure it is the most important thing there is for me.
Truth is not only violated by falsehood; it may be equally outraged by silence.
- Henri Frederic Amiel
I once kept a truth to myself that I would suggest *anyone* tell rather than keep to themselves. I did not tell anyone I was having sex with my father. It was true. And now, I’d rather speak the truth and let chips fall where they may, rather than withhold something true.
Still, I don’t need to be losing friends over saying something that bothers them, either. I tried the 12 Step thing about “Is it true? Is it kind? Is it necessary?” That doesn’t work for me. I think sometimes unkind things are useful. And how the hell would I know what is necessary? Don’t get me trying to run the universe. I don’t have the brain cells for it. Or, maybe I do, and we are them, but nevermind. That’s a whole discussion on consciousness that doesn’t really fit here.
Katie’s question works really well here, “Whose business am I in when I think that thought?”
The other piece that surfaced (again) this weekend was how I say things as if I am right and the other person is just wrong. I can see how off-putting that has been to some people. And it feels patently false to me to say “In my opinion.” I don’t consider some of this to be opinion at all.
How-some-ever, I can say, “as far as I know…”
Lord (whoever that is – a case in point) knows that I’ve found that some things I used to be dead certain of are not remotely true (astrology, numerology, feng shui, Louise Hay’s body correlations, reincarnation, the existence of a god, to name a few).
So, as far as I know, that’s true.
Love, Ann
We know the truth, not only by the reason, but by the heart.
Blaise Pascal
“In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”
- George Orwell
the Easter Bunny, but that doesn’t make him real.
I know people who believe in “the power of intention” or “the secret” or whatever the latest “I can control the uncontrollable” pop phrase is these days.
To put it very simply, control is an illusion – always.
That scares people.
Apparently we don’t know enough to know that this is the only safety. We cannot know all that is needed to have control. It is actually best for us not to have control. We could not do that job. We can’t even calm our minds for 5 minutes, much less keep up with every heartbeat, breath and organ function in our own bodies, let alone other people, institutions, situations or the world.
To explain in detail, you will find that for every time someone made an attempt to control some person or situation where they got what they thought they wanted, you can find at least as many times that attempt did not work, usually *more* times that it did not work.
These failures to control get explained away with various things from “you didn’t hold your mouth right” to ” someone else’s control was more powerful” to “you had to do it on Tuesday in a blue dress” or “Jesus did not will it,” etc. The worst one is “oh, for that you have to pay me $1000 for the Advanced Control the World Workshop… “
Reality is much simpler than all of these inadequate explanations: we have no control. There is no “power of intent,” and “the secret” is a lie. There is no secret.
That may sound like bad news if someone fears something.
But it’s actually good news.
We don’t need control.
What we *have* is something far more beautiful, and that “something more beautiful” is what I teach through The Work, The Sedona Method, Quantum Wealth, IAM Meditations, etc.
I give people an experience of the beauty & mystery, so that gradually, we lose the lie that there is anything we can (or need to) control.
It is clear in the Sedona Method’s simple question ”Is this about wanting safety, control or approval?” That is The Sedona Method, or the crux of it.
The next step is to release wanting.
Only through releasing wanting can we actually have.
It seems paradoxical when we are stuck in all that wanting, wanting, wanting.
When we are wanting, we are not having.
That sounds obvious, but that is a large part of what anything that we try to follow that imagines we can have control is teaching. It’s teaching wanting, not having.
It’s the letting go that contains the “magic.”
That’s why I say that:
“Peace in our minds and in our lives is a cause-effect relationship.”
We cannot control anything, not even our minds, but if we investigate and observe, we find the peace that is already there.
Love, Ann
I just added this to my Links over there on the right. I want to call attention to one of the articles, which refers to one of the best passages in one of my favorite author’s books.
Kim Anami writes:
http://filthygorgeousthings.com/modern-love/how-to-make-love-stay
In Tom Robbins’ book, Still Life with Woodpecker he asks, “Who know how to make love stay?” It’s an excellent question. He answers it:
“Love is the ultimate outlaw. It just won’t adhere to any rules. The most any of us can do is to sign on as its accomplice. Instead of vowing to honor and obey, maybe we should swear to aid and abet. That would mean that security is out of the question. The words “make” and “stay” become inappropriate. My love for you has no strings attached. I love you for free.”
She goes on to give examples from her life coaching practice.
Sometimes it has felt lonely to be kinky, poly, intellectual, philosophical, mystical and kinky like me, and then I find others who are like me in some of those ways. I even followed the link to Sigmund Fuller’s page off of this article. I clicked on “Books to Read,” and was stunned and surprised to find the first book on the list was “Stumbling on Happiness,” by Daniel Gilbert.
Realistically, other people must have read this book, but it isn’t as if I meet those people every day. Oh, maybe I do. In some of these ways. And I’m not meeting the actual people. Chances are that in person some of them are full of new age fru fru. But the articles are beautiful and sexy and thought-provoking.
Go look:
http://www.filthygorgeousthings.com
Love, Ann
And even though I have given up my belief in astrology – it is unprovable – I still enjoy reading Eric Francis. So, here is what I just read:
Sagittarius (Nov. 22 – Dec. 22)
You are being called upon to give yourself totally not to any one relationship, but to every relationship. One of the big problems on our planet is that we live in a hierarchy of love. Some people are ‘more important’ than other people, and we can act in very strange ways because of this. The outcomes of this situation, however, prove the point that we really don’t know what role people have, and it’s fair to doubt that we have any discernment at all. Monday’s New Moon is calling on you to suspend all discernment and make sure that you are offering what you can to every situation you are in. I cannot tell you why, or how; I can only tell you what I am reading in the planets. You are a born humanitarian and you know it. This is not merely a dream.
I see. I thought it was pretty odd that after more than half a decade of monogamy, partly because when I get really hooked (Venus in Scorpio, 8th house) I don’t really want anyone else, I now suddenly find myself with a lover (born 12/18) who lives with another girlfriend, supporting another of my ex-lovers (early Capricorn who nearly committed suicide 3 or 4 weeks ago) in overcoming the shock of legal charges by his girlfriend about something complely bogus (WTF???? how dare she?) and helping his new gf find work in this area, while a guy I slept with a few times sleeps here once in a while to be closer to his job, which is fine with my roommate who was once upon a time a lover, and I’ve offered my bf to a girlfriend who is depressed (he’d be good for her) and suggested he couch surf on the way to CA at another gf’s house in Albuquerque (she’s a Dom, I’m not) and well, you get the idea… I should stop here, to anyone but you, Eric, this sounds quite complex and crazy. In fact, today my ex-husband wrote me to help edit a notice that his wife has a terminal disease so he can say this appropriately in a mass email, and I got a note from another ex-lover on beauty, and friended another ex’s ex on Facebook so we can both support him through the suicidal depression he has just been through.
Got all that?
Suffice it to say that my polyamory ran over my monogamy when I wasn’t looking. You’re right – no one relationship is more important than any other. Everybody seems to be very happy and flexible and open.
There is nowhere even a hint of jealousy and most of these people have read the excellent article, Jealousy & the Abyss by William Pennell Rock, at http://www.planetwaves.net/jealousy because I sent it to them – most of them nearly a decade ago.
Polyamory? I gave it up and it showed up in spades.
Hmm.
Much love, Ann
*** SPOILER ALERT *** SPOILER ALERT *** SPOILER ALERT ***
Answer: When it is the new Star Trek movie.
The tag line “The future begins” is true.
George told me he was boycotting Star Trek. After I saw it the second time, I called him and raved about it. I asked why he was boycotting. He said, “they totally changed Spock’s character. He has emotions!”
I said, “I understand. They f*cked everything up, but trust me, THEY STILL GOT IT RIGHT!” I told him that if he saw it and did not agree with me, I would refund him the price of the movie.
First, there are many, many homages, some of which I am sure I am still missing, so, including, but not limited to the bug-eyed alien in the bar in one of the first scenes, that looks like it should be in Star Wars, not Star Trek, which clues us to how much the new Kirk is going to be like Hans Solo; the way Scotty is shoved through a water pipe, as if he is going to the Juicing Room in Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory, and all of the homages to Star Trek itself, which you can see for yourself when you get there.
Then there is the way that they are reframing how Kirk (intuition) and Spock (logic) interact and get to know each other, which I found just mind-blowing. Mind blowing.
One of the best things about the new Star Trek is that WE ARE FINALLY BACK TO THE BIGGER MORE ARCHETYPAL THEMES THAT GENE RODDENBERRY WAS *SO* GOOD AT!!!!
All due respect to Mr. Rick Berman, but his worlds were smaller, his stories more political, more this-worldy, less interesting to me than Roddenberry’s. I did not have the chills and sense of rightness and wholeness that I experienced when I saw Mr. Roddenberry’s worlds and works.
In the new Star Trek movie, this is back.
At first, I was disturbed by the lack of the mostly closed set, the use of tons of computer animation and graphics that is so updating the way Star Trek is portrayed. But as the story grabbed me and held me and breathed me into that sense of rightness I so loved in Roddenberry’s Star Trek, I realized that they had done it. They have really done it.
It’s Star Trek. It is really Star Trek.